The Key Role of Adjusted R-Squared in Decision-Making
In people analytics, regression models are essential tools for predicting outcomes such as employee turnover, engagement, performance, and compensation. These models help analysts understand the relationship between various factors (independent variables) and a specific outcome (dependent variable). One common metric used to assess how well a regression model fits the data is R-squared (R²). However, a more nuanced and often overlooked metric is Adjusted R-squared, which offers a more accurate representation of model quality, especially when working with multiple predictors.
For people analytics enthusiasts who are just starting out or not fully proficient in data analysis, understanding the distinction between R-squared and Adjusted R-squared is crucial for building more reliable models and making better decisions based on those models.
In simple terms, R-squared tells you how well your independent variables explain the variability in the dependent variable. It ranges from 0 to 1, where:
For example, if you build a model to predict employee engagement based on factors like tenure, age, and performance ratings, an R-squared value of 0.60 indicates that 60% of the variation in employee engagement is explained by these factors.
While R-squared is helpful, it has a significant limitation: it always increases when you add more predictors, even if those predictors don’t actually improve the model's predictive power. This can give a false impression that adding more variables always makes the model better. In reality, adding too many predictors can lead to overfitting—when the model fits the training data too closely but performs poorly on new data.
Adjusted R-squared is a more sophisticated version of R-squared that accounts for the number of predictors in the model. It adjusts for the fact that adding more variables to the model increases R-squared, whether or not those variables are meaningful. This adjustment ensures that only predictors that genuinely contribute to the model's explanatory power are rewarded.
Adjusted R-squared can decrease if irrelevant predictors are added, meaning it penalizes models that include too many unnecessary variables. This makes it a much more reliable measure of model quality, especially in people analytics, where large datasets with numerous variables are common.
In people analytics, the complexity of data can be overwhelming. HR datasets often contain numerous variables—everything from demographic details (age, gender, tenure) to job-related metrics (performance ratings, engagement scores, promotion history). It’s easy to fall into the trap of adding as many predictors as possible in the hopes of improving the model. However, this approach is not ideal, and ultimately undermines the model's value. This is where Adjusted R-Squared becomes crucial.
Overfitting occurs when a model is tailored too closely to the specific data it was trained on, which can result in poor performance on new or unseen data. Adjusted R-squared helps prevent overfitting by penalizing models with too many predictors that don’t add real value.
For instance, if you’re building a regression model to predict employee turnover, it may be tempting to include a wide array of predictors like job role, department, tenure, engagement, age, and more. While this may increase the R-squared, Adjusted R-squared will penalize the model if any of these variables don’t genuinely improve its predictive power.
In statistical modeling, parsimony refers to the principle that a model should be as simple as possible while still explaining the data. Adjusted R-squared encourages parsimony by rewarding models that explain the most with the fewest variables. This is especially important in people analytics, where presenting complex models to HR stakeholders who may not have technical expertise can be a challenge.
For example, when explaining a turnover model to an HR manager, a simpler model with a higher Adjusted R-squared is easier to communicate and more likely to be trusted than a complex model that appears artificially inflated by unnecessary predictors.
When building multiple regression models, you may want to compare different versions to see which one performs best. For example, you might build one model that includes engagement scores, tenure, and compensation, and another model that includes demographic factors like age and department. R-squared alone may indicate that adding more predictors increases the model’s explanatory power, but Adjusted R-squared provides a better metric for comparing models because it accounts for the number of variables.
In people analytics, where datasets can be large and multifaceted, using Adjusted R-squared allows you to identify the most efficient models—those that provide the best fit with the fewest predictors.
One of the key goals of regression models in people analytics is to make accurate predictions about employee behavior, such as predicting which employees are at risk of leaving the company. By focusing on models with high Adjusted R-squared values, you can ensure that your predictions are based on variables that truly matter, leading to more accurate and actionable insights.
For example, if you’re predicting employee turnover, a model with a high Adjusted R-squared that includes only relevant predictors will provide more accurate predictions than a model with a high R-squared but many unnecessary variables.
Let’s consider an example of why Adjusted R-squared matters in people analytics.
You’re building a model to predict employee turnover. You start by including a few predictors such as tenure, engagement score, and department. The R-squared value of this model is 0.55, meaning that these variables explain 55% of the variability in turnover.
Next, you add more variables like age, gender, marital status, and manager’s tenure. After including these variables, the R-squared value increases to 0.70. However, when you check the Adjusted R-squared, you find that it only increased slightly from 0.52 to 0.53.
This small increase in Adjusted R-squared suggests that the additional predictors (age, gender, etc.) are not contributing much to the explanatory power of the model, even though R-squared increased. In this case, the Adjusted R-squared is telling you that these extra variables may not be necessary, and you should focus on the simpler model with fewer predictors.
To make the most of Adjusted R-squared in your people analytics work, follow these best practices:
While R-squared is a valuable metric, Adjusted R-squared provides a more accurate assessment of model quality by accounting for the number of predictors in the model. For people analysts, understanding and using Adjusted R-squared can help ensure that your models are both reliable and interpretable.
By focusing on Adjusted R-squared, you can avoid overfitting, build more efficient models, and provide HR leaders with insights that are both actionable and trustworthy. As you progress in your people analytics journey, using Adjusted R-squared will enable you to make more informed, data-driven decisions that improve organizational outcomes.
Ready to dive deeper into techniques like regression modeling? At DataSkillUp, we help people analysts develop the quantitative and qualitative skills needed to excel in the field of people analytics. Reach out today to learn how we can support your growth in the exciting field of people analytics.
Book a 60-minute discovery call to learn how we can help you achieve your People Analytics goals here.
Learn more about our coaching programs here.
Connect with us on LinkedIn here.
